Differences between revisions 27 and 28
Revision 27 as of 2005-08-23 01:19:05
Size: 1686
Editor: yakko
Comment:
Revision 28 as of 2020-01-26 17:49:52
Size: 1526
Editor: scot
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 2: Line 2:
[[latex2($\{G_{ \alpha } \}_{\alpha \in A}$)]] of open sets such that
[[latex2($E \subset \bigcup_{\alpha \in A}G_{\alpha}$)]], there is a finite set
[[latex2($\{\alpha_1 ,..., \alpha_n \} \subset A$)]] such that
[[latex2($E \subset \bigcup_{i=1}^{n} G_{\alpha_i}$)]].
$$\{G_{ \alpha } \}_{\alpha \in A}$$ of open sets such that
$$E \subset \bigcup_{\alpha \in A}G_{\alpha}$$, there is a finite set
$$\{\alpha_1 ,..., \alpha_n \} \subset A$$ such that
$$E \subset \bigcup_{i=1}^{n} G_{\alpha_i}$$.
Line 8: Line 8:
[[latex2($G_n = \left(\frac{1}{n},2\right)$)]]. If
[[latex2($0<x \leq 1$)]], there is a positive integer n such that
[[latex2($\frac{1}{n} < x$)]]; hence,
[[latex2($x \in G_n$)]], and thus
$$G_n = \left(\frac{1}{n},2\right)$$. If
$$0<x \leq 1$$, there is a positive integer n such that
$$\frac{1}{n} < x$$; hence,
$$x \in G_n$$, and thus
Line 13: Line 13:
[[latex2($$E \subset \bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty}G_n$$)]] $$$E \subset \bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty}G_n$$$
Line 16: Line 16:
[[latex2($n_1,...,n_r$)]] of positive integers, then $$n_1,...,n_r$$ of positive integers, then
Line 18: Line 18:
[[latex2($$\bigcup_{i=1}^{r} G_{n_i}=G_{n_0}$$)]] $$$\bigcup_{i=1}^{r} G_{n_i}=G_{n_0}$$$
Line 21: Line 21:
[[latex2($n_0=\max\{n_1,...,n_r\}$)]] and $$n_0=\max\{n_1,...,n_r\}$$ and
Line 23: Line 23:
[[latex2($$E \not\subset G_{n_0}=\left(\frac{1}{n_0},2\right)$$)]] $$$E \not\subset G_{n_0}=\left(\frac{1}{n_0},2\right)$$$
Line 26: Line 26:
[[latex2($\{G_n\}_{n \in J}$)]] such that
[[latex2($E \subset \bigcup_{n \in J} G_n$)]], but no finite subfamily has this property. From the definition, it is clear that ''E'' is not compact.
$$\{G_n\}_{n \in J}$$ such that
$$E \subset \bigcup_{n \in J} G_n$$, but no finite subfamily has this property. From the definition, it is clear that ''E'' is not compact.
Line 29: Line 29:
'''Heine-Borel Theorom''': A set [[latex2(\usepackage{amsfonts} % $E \subset \mathbb{R}$)]] is compact iff ''E'' is closed and bounded. '''Heine-Borel Theorom''': A set $\usepackage{amsfonts} % $E \subset \mathbb{R}$$ is compact iff ''E'' is closed and bounded.

Definition A set E is compact if and only if, for every family $$\{G_{ \alpha } \}_{\alpha \in A}$$ of open sets such that $$E \subset \bigcup_{\alpha \in A}G_{\alpha}$$, there is a finite set $$\{\alpha_1 ,..., \alpha_n \} \subset A$$ such that $$E \subset \bigcup_{i=1}^{n} G_{\alpha_i}$$.

Example: Let E=(0,1] and for each positive integer n, let $$G_n = \left(\frac{1}{n},2\right)$$. If $$0<x \leq 1$$, there is a positive integer n such that $$\frac{1}{n} < x$$; hence, $$x \in G_n$$, and thus

$$$E \subset \bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty}G_n$$$

If we choose a finite set $$n_1,...,n_r$$ of positive integers, then

$$$\bigcup_{i=1}^{r} G_{n_i}=G_{n_0}$$$

where $$n_0=\max\{n_1,...,n_r\}$$ and

$$$E \not\subset G_{n_0}=\left(\frac{1}{n_0},2\right)$$$

Thus, we have a family of open sets $$\{G_n\}_{n \in J}$$ such that $$E \subset \bigcup_{n \in J} G_n$$, but no finite subfamily has this property. From the definition, it is clear that E is not compact.

Heine-Borel Theorom: A set $\usepackage{amsfonts} % $E \subset \mathbb{R}$$ is compact iff E is closed and bounded.

Examples:

  • [2,8] is a compact set.
  • The unit disk including the boundary is a compact set.
  • (3,5] is not a compact set.

Note that all of these examples are of sets that are uncountably infinite.

Definitions from: Introduction to Analysis 5th edition by Edward D. Gaughan

Theorom: The union of compact sets is compact.

CompactSet (last edited 2020-01-26 17:51:19 by scot)